Hi, Thursday, June 19, 2003, 2:16:52 PM, you wrote:
> Bob W wrote: >>On cave 'logic', if a slide is a slide and therefore not a photograph, >>and an inkjet print is an inkjet print and therefore not a >>photograph, presumably a silver halide print is a silver halide print, >>and therefore not a photograph, a daguerrotype is a daguerrotype and >>therefore not a photograph, and so on. This subterranean logic seems to >>suggest there is no such thing as a photograph, unless we count the platonic >>shadows of reality dancing on the cave walls, and the language of the cave >>has no concept of the general, only the specific. > Jees Bob, will you teach me how to write like that? You da man! Suck on > that cave dude ;-) I can do you a nice price on a 12-week correspondence course from the Bart Sontag Academy of Deconstructionist Post-Modern Dialectic Art Crit., If you accept this offer I'll throw in a free seminar on the Pre-Hegelian Hermeneutics of Structuralist Reification Theory. And you can't say fairer than that, guv. -- Cheers, Bob mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
