Bob W wrote: >On cave 'logic', if a slide is a slide and therefore not a photograph, >and an inkjet print is an inkjet print and therefore not a >photograph, presumably a silver halide print is a silver halide print, >and therefore not a photograph, a daguerrotype is a daguerrotype and >therefore not a photograph, and so on. This subterranean logic seems to >suggest there is no such thing as a photograph, unless we count the platonic >shadows of reality dancing on the cave walls, and the language of the cave >has no concept of the general, only the specific.
Jees Bob, will you teach me how to write like that? You da man! Suck on that cave dude ;-) Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _____________________________ Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk
