With results coming off an Agfa D-Lab, I can see the difference between 67 and 35mm in a 4X5 print. I think perhaps a better way to put it, is the results are not objectionable up to a certain size with 35mm.
Bruce Tuesday, January 28, 2003, 6:11:15 AM, you wrote: >snip< PJ> I would just like to add that I'm equally opposed to the argument PJ> that 35mm is as good as medium format until you magnify the image PJ> beyond a certain point. This is of course nonsense as medium PJ> format is "better" than 35mm from the moment you press the shutter PJ> regardless what you do with the image afterwards. What people PJ> really are saying is that the printing process they are using at PJ> present is so lousy that they cannot see the difference between MF PJ> and 35mm until the image is blown up to huge sizes, but this has PJ> of course nothing to do with 35mm vs. MF per se but everything to PJ> do with quality, or lack thereof, of the printing process. PJ> P�l
