Dave posted on Sat, 24 Aug 2013 11:28:15 +0100 as excerpted: > References: <201308200021.15865....@dgmm.net> <201308201421.25554.pan@dgmm. > net> <5217c93f.6080...@gmail.com>
[snipped more headers] > User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-RELEASE-p5; KDE/4.10.5; amd64; ; ) As you can see here, your kmail was broken in the same way at this point. I spent quite some time reading what appears to be the current Internet Message Format RFC (5322): http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322 ... and concluded that FWS (folding white-space) would be (SHOULD level) between the individual message-ids, so between > < elements. *HOWEVER*, at the MUST level, it's ALLOWED between the <> delimiters as well, AS LONG AS it appears either immediately inside the <> delimiters or on either side of the @. But a fold is *NOT* allowed within a dot-atom, that is, on either side of a dot or between letters/digits, which is exactly where it's appearing here, since the fold is between dgmm. (fold) net. So that's broken, and it's kmail doing it, not pan. So indeed, it's almost certainly the library, since both pan and kmail were broken for you with the bad library, and pan "unbroke" when you changed to an earlier (2.4 series instead of 2.6) gmime. But as I wrote earlier, I think the breakage was in gmime 2.6.16, with the intro of the new folding. Now to test /that/... -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
