On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:54:15 +0000, Duncan wrote: > Jim Henderson <hende...@gmail.com> posted > ghucvl$p0...@ger.gmane.org, excerpted below, on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 > 19:10:45 +0000: > >> IIRC, isn't RFC-compliant usage of the References header to use the >> root message in the thread (as best the client can determine), the >> message being replied to, and the parent to that? > > Now to correctly answer that, I'd have to go look up the RFC, wouldn't > I? That sounds like work! =:^)
That it does - I just kinda assumed you were more familiar with the RFCs than I was. :-) > Regardless of RFC, tho, it's common sense. Well, that rules *that* out. Common sense is so uncommon these days. ;-) > But what I suspect is happening here is the server is using a Bayesian > filter on either all headers or the entire message, and keying in on Could be, or it could be that they had a problem with a spammer using pan and blocked it using the postfilter - though usually, the spambots use custom software that helpfully identifies itself as such. Jim -- Jim Henderson Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
