[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Frank Tabor wrote: >> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:47:10 +0200, Per Hedeland wrote: >> >> >>> Steven Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> For the most part it is a great improvement over the old Pan. NBZ >>>> support and the better memory footprint alone are awesome, but I >>>> do have a couple of niggles. >>>> >>>> 1. Articles aren't marked as read when downloaded. >>>> >>> Nor should they be - surely old-pan didn't do that? Or maybe you >>> mean "when saved"? If so it seems they are in 0.131. >>> >>> --Per Hedeland >>> >> >> I believe he means filtered articles. >> >> > Ok to clarify, I mean saved. I select a bunch of articles and select > save to disk. They don't get marked as read as they are > saved, in older > Pan 1.x versions they did > > > Steve
When I download and save articles using Pan 0.131 they are marked read. They change from bold to not bold anyway. -- Travis in Shoreline Washington _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
