Steven Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >For the most part it is a great improvement over the old Pan. NBZ >support and the better memory footprint alone are awesome, but I do have >a couple of niggles. > >1. Articles aren't marked as read when downloaded.
Nor should they be - surely old-pan didn't do that? Or maybe you mean "when saved"? If so it seems they are in 0.131. --Per Hedeland _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
