On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:47:10 +0200, Per Hedeland wrote: > Steven Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>For the most part it is a great improvement over the old Pan. NBZ >>support and the better memory footprint alone are awesome, but I do have >>a couple of niggles. >> >>1. Articles aren't marked as read when downloaded. > > Nor should they be - surely old-pan didn't do that? Or maybe you mean > "when saved"? If so it seems they are in 0.131. > > --Per Hedeland
I believe he means filtered articles. -- Frank Tabor Q: Why did the astrophysicist order three hamburgers? A: Because he was hungry. _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
