Yes, you could do a WMI scan on post registration that checks if a process is 
there or not.

You need a account that has administrative rights on the device that you check.

Thanks,

Ludovic Zammit
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145) ::  
www.inverse.ca <https://www.inverse.ca/>
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu <http://www.sogo.nu/>) 
and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org <http://packetfence.org/>)







> On Feb 26, 2021, at 12:03 PM, NITISH AGGARWAL <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> But I can see security event triggered for SEPM provisioning on node. But the 
> problem is it actually not restricting access.
> 
> Can I use wmi scan in my environment??
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 22:31 Ludovic Zammit <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> No DHCP, no provisioner.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ludovic Zammit
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145) ::  
> www.inverse.ca <https://www.inverse.ca/>
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu 
> <http://www.sogo.nu/>) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org 
> <http://packetfence.org/>)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Feb 26, 2021, at 11:52 AM, NITISH AGGARWAL <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> I donot have DHCP server installed, no provisioning for DHCP. It's all 
>> static ip.
>> 
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 22:21 Ludovic Zammit <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Does PF receives DHCP ACK from the production DHCP server ?
>> 
>> Did you install the DHCP sensor ?
>> 
>> https://www.packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Installation_Guide.html#_microsoft_dhcp_sensor
>>  
>> <https://www.packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Installation_Guide.html#_microsoft_dhcp_sensor>
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Ludovic Zammit
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145) :: 
>>  www.inverse.ca <https://www.inverse.ca/>
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu 
>> <http://www.sogo.nu/>) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org 
>> <http://packetfence.org/>)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Feb 26, 2021, at 11:44 AM, NITISH AGGARWAL <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> As such there is no restriction on when to check for provisioning although 
>>> I have selected option of checking after registration of device.
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 22:11 Ludovic Zammit <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> Provisioner workflow are triggered by DHCP traffic seen from the Production 
>>> or Registration networks.
>>> 
>>> When do you want to check if Symantec is installed ?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Ludovic Zammit
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145) 
>>> ::  www.inverse.ca <https://www.inverse.ca/>
>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu 
>>> <http://www.sogo.nu/>) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org 
>>> <http://packetfence.org/>)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 26, 2021, at 11:40 AM, NITISH AGGARWAL <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Yes....as I connects the device it went into registration vlan and then if 
>>>> it is in domain it gets authenticated and vlan changes as per switch.
>>>> 
>>>> Dot1x is working fine...but problem is with Symantec. How to check if end 
>>>> device has Symantec client installed and working.
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 22:07 Ludovic Zammit <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> Your devices that connect on PF are statically IP addressed?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> Ludovic Zammit
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145) 
>>>> ::  www.inverse.ca <https://www.inverse.ca/>
>>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu 
>>>> <http://www.sogo.nu/>) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org 
>>>> <http://packetfence.org/>)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 25, 2021, at 9:55 AM, NITISH AGGARWAL via PacketFence-users 
>>>>> <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have setup PacketFence zen as per guide. I can see dot1x authentication 
>>>>> working with MSCHAPv2 auth, so non domain users are not getting access, 
>>>>> which is required. I am using auto-registration in connection profile.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Second, I have to check for Symantec in my endpoints. I have setup SEPM 
>>>>> provisioning as per document. During authentication, I can see security 
>>>>> event generated for provisioning on my node in PacketFence but my end 
>>>>> device got access to intranet no matter symantec installed on it or not.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have tried everything I could. I need some help in this case. I am 
>>>>> using static ips and cisco 2960. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I need devices to be registered if they have both domain connected and 
>>>>> SEPM installed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Any help will be appreciated. Thanks in advance...
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users 
>>>>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users>
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to