On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río < jaime.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:26 AM, cjw <c...@ncf.ca> wrote: > >> These are good issues, that need to be discussed and resolved. Python >> has the benefit of having a BDFL. Numpy has no similar arrangement. >> In the post-numarray period, Travis Oliphant took that role and advanced >> the package in many ways. >> >> It seems that Travis is no longer available. There is a need for >> someone, or maybe some group of three, who would be guided by the sort of >> thinking Charles Harris sets out above, who would make the final decision. >> > > We should crown Charles philosopher king, and let him wisely rule over us > with the aid of his aristocracy of devs with merge rights. We would make > Plato proud! :-) > Charles I needs an heir in case of execution by the Parliamentary forces. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
