On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:26 AM, cjw <c...@ncf.ca> wrote: > These are good issues, that need to be discussed and resolved. Python has > the benefit of having a BDFL. Numpy has no similar arrangement. > In the post-numarray period, Travis Oliphant took that role and advanced > the package in many ways. > > It seems that Travis is no longer available. There is a need for someone, > or maybe some group of three, who would be guided by the sort of thinking > Charles Harris sets out above, who would make the final decision. >
We should crown Charles philosopher king, and let him wisely rule over us with the aid of his aristocracy of devs with merge rights. We would make Plato proud! :-) Jaime -- (\__/) ( O.o) ( > <) Este es Conejo. Copia a Conejo en tu firma y ayúdale en sus planes de dominación mundial.
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
