Re: [Numpy-discussion] Does a `mergesorted` function make sense?

On 02/09/2014 8:40 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:



On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Eelco Hoogendoorn <hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com <mailto:hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Charles R Harris
    <charlesr.har...@gmail.com <mailto:charlesr.har...@gmail.com>> wrote:




        On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Eelco Hoogendoorn
        <hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com
        <mailto:hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com>> wrote:

            Sure, id like to do the hashing things out, but I would
            also like some preliminary feedback as to whether this is
            going in a direction anyone else sees the point of, if it
            conflicts with other plans, and indeed if we can agree
            that numpy is the right place for it; a point which I
            would very much like to defend. If there is some obvious
            no-go that im missing, I can do without the drudgery of
            writing proper documentation ;).

These are good issues, that need to be discussed and resolved. Python has the benefit of having a BDFL. Numpy has no similar arrangement. In the post-numarray period, Travis Oliphant took that role and advanced the package in many ways.

It seems that Travis is no longer available. There is a need for someone, or maybe some group of three, who would be guided by the sort of thinking Charles Harris sets out above, who would make the final decision.

Colin W.
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to