Hello.

On 10/27/2015 06:02 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:

CHECKSUM_PARTIAL skbs should never arrive in ip_fragment. If we get one
of those warn about them once and handle them gracefully by recalculating
the checksum.

Cc: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasev...@gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin Coddington <bcodd...@redhat.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <t...@herbertland.com>
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <han...@stressinduktion.org>
---
  net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 8 +++++---
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
index 0b02417..3f94a3b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
@@ -533,6 +533,11 @@ int ip_do_fragment(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, 
struct sk_buff *skb,

        dev = rt->dst.dev;

+       /* for offloaded checksums cleanup checksum before fragmentation */
+       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) &&
+           (err = skb_checksum_help(skb)))

scripts/checkpatch.pl shou;d have complained about using = in the *if* expression.

+               goto fail;
+
        /*
         *      Point into the IP datagram header.
         */
[...]

MBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to