On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:13:22AM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > There still seems to be good candidates for inline in *.c files, in worst > case I had +172 due to inline removed and ~60 are on +10-+90 range with > my gcc, later gccs might do better but I definately would just blindly > remove them all. Here's the other end of the list:
Right. If the inline helps the compiler perform code size optimisations that it otherwise couldn't then it might be worthwhile. So when in doubt, check the assembly :) Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
