From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 21:10:16 +0800
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 02:48:10AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Now as a separate issue we (ie: you) need to work out what _other_ things > > you want ASSERT_RTNL to check apart from "rtnl must be held". > > Since we have now established that ASSERT_RTNL never actually > warned about usage on paths with BH off, I think Eric's original > patch is fine as it is and I owe him an apology. Ok, same here... Such situations (ASSERT_RTNL() in atomic context) have always been bugs though, and that continues to be true and I think the check should be added somehow. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
