On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 01:37:40PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > I agree with this. IIRC I removed some ASSERT_RTNL()s in the wireless > code (or maybe it was only during testing patches) where we had a > function that required only the rtnl to be held but in certain contexts > was called from within an RCU section.
Please point me to the actual code so I can see if this is legit or not. Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
