On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 13:44:18 -0400 Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It can be done once at probe. At first I thought about doing this in > > setup_errata, but this is not an erratum. So shall I create a new > > method for this in chip operations structure? Something like > > port_additional_setup() ? > > No. Those "setup" or "config" functions are likely to do everything and > become a mess, thus unmaintainable. Operations must be specific. What about Andrew's complaint, then, abouth the two additional parameters?
