From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallwe...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 22:34:34 +0100
> On 11.02.2019 22:19, David Miller wrote: >> From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallwe...@gmail.com> >> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 20:19:17 +0100 >> >>> Bit 0 in register 1.5 doesn't represent a device but is a flag that >>> Clause 22 registers are present. Therefore disregard this bit when >>> populating the device list. If code needs this information it >>> should read register 1.5 directly instead of accessing the device >>> list. >>> Because this bit doesn't represent a device don't define a >>> MDIO_MMD_XYZ constant, just define a MDIO_DEVS_XYZ constant for >>> the flag in the device list bitmap. >> ... >> >> This doesn't apply cleanly to net-next, please respin. >> > You applied v2 already, and with a follow-up patch I "upgraded" > it to v3. So you can disregard this series. Oh that's right, thanks.
