On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 08:21:24PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > Bit 0 in register 1.5 doesn't represent a device but is a flag that > Clause 22 registers are present. Therefore disregard this bit when > populating the device list. If code needs this information it > should read register 1.5 directly instead of accessing the device > list. > > Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallwe...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>
Andrew
