On 11.02.2019 22:19, David Miller wrote:
> From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallwe...@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 20:19:17 +0100
> 
>> Bit 0 in register 1.5 doesn't represent a device but is a flag that
>> Clause 22 registers are present. Therefore disregard this bit when
>> populating the device list. If code needs this information it
>> should read register 1.5 directly instead of accessing the device
>> list.
>> Because this bit doesn't represent a device don't define a
>> MDIO_MMD_XYZ constant, just define a MDIO_DEVS_XYZ constant for
>> the flag in the device list bitmap.
>  ...
> 
> This doesn't apply cleanly to net-next, please respin.
> 
You applied v2 already, and with a follow-up patch I "upgraded"
it to v3. So you can disregard this series.

> Thanks.
> 

Reply via email to