I don't see any reason why packets with DSCP=0x40 should have lower IEEE
802.1D priority than packets with DSCP=0x20. Spare > Background. No?
Signed-off-by: Zhu Yi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/d80211/wme.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
e1765ea0d80ad86619300d3253e801883fd745a5
diff --git a/net/d80211/wme.c b/net/d80211/wme.c
index b9505dc..f26fe6c 100644
--- a/net/d80211/wme.c
+++ b/net/d80211/wme.c
@@ -131,9 +131,9 @@ static inline unsigned classify_1d(struc
dscp = ip->tos & 0xfc;
switch (dscp) {
case 0x20:
- return 2;
- case 0x40:
return 1;
+ case 0x40:
+ return 2;
case 0x60:
return 3;
case 0x80:
--
1.2.6
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
