On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:02:27 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote:
> I don't see any reason why packets with DSCP=0x40 should have lower IEEE
> 802.1D priority than packets with DSCP=0x20. Spare > Background. No?
Applied to my tree, thanks.
I also applied the following patch on top of it:
--
Subject: [PATCH] d80211: simplify classify_1d
The switch in classify_1d can be simplified to a bit operation.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/d80211/wme.c | 19 ++-----------------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--- dscape.orig/net/d80211/wme.c
+++ dscape/net/d80211/wme.c
@@ -129,24 +129,9 @@ static inline unsigned classify_1d(struc
ip = (struct iphdr *) (skb->data + offset);
dscp = ip->tos & 0xfc;
- switch (dscp) {
- case 0x20:
- return 1;
- case 0x40:
- return 2;
- case 0x60:
- return 3;
- case 0x80:
- return 4;
- case 0xa0:
- return 5;
- case 0xc0:
- return 6;
- case 0xe0:
- return 7;
- default:
+ if (dscp & 0x1c)
return 0;
- }
+ return dscp >> 5;
}
--
Jiri Benc
SUSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
