On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:02:27 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote:
> I don't see any reason why packets with DSCP=0x40 should have lower IEEE
> 802.1D priority than packets with DSCP=0x20. Spare > Background. No?
Hm, seems so. Jouni, is there any reason for this?
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
>
> net/d80211/wme.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> e1765ea0d80ad86619300d3253e801883fd745a5
> diff --git a/net/d80211/wme.c b/net/d80211/wme.c
> index b9505dc..f26fe6c 100644
> --- a/net/d80211/wme.c
> +++ b/net/d80211/wme.c
> @@ -131,9 +131,9 @@ static inline unsigned classify_1d(struc
> dscp = ip->tos & 0xfc;
> switch (dscp) {
> case 0x20:
> - return 2;
> - case 0x40:
> return 1;
> + case 0x40:
> + return 2;
> case 0x60:
> return 3;
> case 0x80:
Thanks,
Jiri
--
Jiri Benc
SUSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
