On 07/09/2018 04:34 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > and number of tx queues? > > You seem to self inflict losses on the sender, and that is terrible for the > (convoluted) stress test you want to run. > > I use mq + fq : no losses on the sender. > > Do not send patches to solve a problem that does not exist on the field. > > If some customers are using netperf and UDP_STREAM with frags, just tell them > to > use TCP instead :) > Alternatively, you could try to patch fq_codel to drop all frags of one UDP datagram instead of few of them.
- [RFC PATCH] ip: re-introduce fragments cache worker Paolo Abeni
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ip: re-introduce fragments cache worker Eric Dumazet
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ip: re-introduce fragments cache wor... Paolo Abeni
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ip: re-introduce fragments cache... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ip: re-introduce fragments c... Paolo Abeni
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ip: re-introduce fragme... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ip: re-introduce fr... Paolo Abeni
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ip: re-introduc... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ip: re-introduc... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ip: re-introduc... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ip: re-introduc... Paolo Abeni
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ip: re-introduc... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ip: re-introduc... Paolo Abeni
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ip: re-introduc... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ip: re-introduce fragme... Eric Dumazet