From: Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 10:18:36 +0200
> Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 10:05:28AM CEST, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
>>On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 09:52:30AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 12:15:03AM CEST, dsah...@kernel.org wrote:
>>> > if (!mlxsw_sp_port->split) {
>>> > netdev_err(mlxsw_sp_port->dev, "Port wasn't split\n");
>>> >+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Port was not split");
>>>
>>> I wonder if we need the dmesg for these as well. Plus it is not the same
>>> (wasn't/was not) which is maybe confusing. Any objection against the
>>> original dmesg messages removal?
>>
>>We had this discussion about three months ago and decided to keep the
>>existing messages:
>>https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=151982813309466&w=2
>
> I forgot. Thanks for reminding me. So could we at least have the
> messages 100% same? Thanks.
Seems like a reasonable request, David A.?
