Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 10:05:28AM CEST, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 09:52:30AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 12:15:03AM CEST, dsah...@kernel.org wrote:
>> > if (!mlxsw_sp_port->split) {
>> > netdev_err(mlxsw_sp_port->dev, "Port wasn't split\n");
>> >+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Port was not split");
>>
>> I wonder if we need the dmesg for these as well. Plus it is not the same
>> (wasn't/was not) which is maybe confusing. Any objection against the
>> original dmesg messages removal?
>
>We had this discussion about three months ago and decided to keep the
>existing messages:
>https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=151982813309466&w=2
I forgot. Thanks for reminding me. So could we at least have the
messages 100% same? Thanks.
