On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 09:52:30AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 12:15:03AM CEST, dsah...@kernel.org wrote:
> > if (!mlxsw_sp_port->split) {
> > netdev_err(mlxsw_sp_port->dev, "Port wasn't split\n");
> >+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Port was not split");
>
> I wonder if we need the dmesg for these as well. Plus it is not the same
> (wasn't/was not) which is maybe confusing. Any objection against the
> original dmesg messages removal?
We had this discussion about three months ago and decided to keep the
existing messages:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=151982813309466&w=2
