Il 11/12/2020 12:45 pm, andrea cardini ha scritto:
Dear All,
I am looking for geometric morphometric papers where people compared, in
2D photos, the magnitude of digitization error (same pics landmarked
twice or more) with that due to the orientation of the specimens (two
pics or more for each specimen). I'd like to know how much variance the
different sources accounted for and I am mainly interested in this when
applied to 'highly 3D' structures such as vertebrate crania, mandibles,
long bones etc.
Dear Andrea,
apologies for the delayed reply. These kind of analyses on fish body
shape are present in my 2016 review
- Fruciano 2016 - Development Genes and Evolution
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-016-0537-4
(Tables 3 and 5, depending on whether a correction for body arching was
performed)
I suppose fish body shape is approximately "as 3D" as mandibles (i.e.,
relatively flat). I am also quite confident you know this particular
paper, but I thought I would mention it in the unlikely case that you
haven't noticed this specific analysis and/or in case anyone else is
interested in the topic.
Best,
Carmelo
--
==================
Carmelo Fruciano
Italian National Research Council (CNR)
IRBIM Messina
http://www.fruciano.org/
==================
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Morphmet" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/morphmet2/97f29f2a-a37b-64d4-5f72-efafaedceaf6%40unict.it.
