Shlomi,

Sorry, we have been postmodern for a while now, to go back to modern would be yet more fodder for the haters.

Also, Moose is very much postmodern for all the reasons that have been cited in this thread already. It is not just us being arty software hipsters, but is truly what I believe to be the more appropriate description of what Moose is and where it fits within the Perl ecosystem.

That all said, if the word "postmodern" has negative or different connotations within a culture (in this case Israeli) then any translated materials should take that into account and perhaps look for a better word that means the same thing.

- Stevan




On Apr 11, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi all,

I hope I'm not going to start a flamewar or appear as too domineering (which I know has been an ongoing problem with me) but I'd like to make the proposal in
the subject:

{{{
Let's start referring to Moose as "the modern Perl 5 Object System" instead of
"the post-modern Perl 5 Object System".
}}}

The reason is that "post-modern" tends to have very bad connotations in art and philosophy, outside the narrow context of Larry Wall's presentation "Perl, the first post-modern language", which even many Perl programmers are not familiar with, and may give people who are first introduced to the topic the wrong idea. On the other hand saying that Moose is a *modern* Object System
will normally immediately give people the right idea.

I know that it's cute to call Moose the "post-modern OOP system" but it may either make people wonder what the hell we mean, or may even give the wrong
impression, so I suggest we drop it.

I don't mind working on the patch to the site and to Moose.pm to change all "post-modern"'s to "modern"'s, but I'd like to know it would be accepted
first.

Regards,

        Shlomi Fish

P.S: of course, it could be much worse - Moose could have been called "Moose, the new age Perl 5 object system". ;-) (Though, for the record, I like a lot
of new age music.)

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish       http://www.shlomifish.org/
Freecell Solver - http://fc-solve.berlios.de/

Deletionists delete Wikipedia articles that they consider lame.
Chuck Norris deletes deletionists whom he considers lame.

Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .

Reply via email to