On 10/07/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 08:37:58AM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> > ---- Original message ----
> > >Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:07:40 +0200
> > >From: Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Subject: Encrypting e-mails
> > >To: [email protected]
> > >
> > >Hi
> > >
> > >I have been looking into encrypting my e-mails and was thinking about
> GPG
> > together with Sylpheed, since I am using Sylpheed.
> > >
> > >But I am wondering is there another and "stronger" or "better" way than
> GPG.
> > >
> > >Any recommendations?
> > >
> >
> > mutt has less calories and will make girls want to have sex with you.
> maybe the
> > second part is just advertising hype...
> >
> > it also has s/mime and gpg capabilities, is text based and does your
> laundry.
I have used mutt for a while now and it does not do my laundry.
/Tony - bored to tears at the moment
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
