On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 03:46:26PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote: > On 10/07/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 08:37:58AM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote: > > > ---- Original message ---- > > > >Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:07:40 +0200 > > > >From: Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Subject: Encrypting e-mails > > > >To: [email protected] > > > > > > > >Hi > > > > > > > >I have been looking into encrypting my e-mails and was thinking about > > GPG > > > together with Sylpheed, since I am using Sylpheed. > > > > > > > >But I am wondering is there another and "stronger" or "better" way than > > GPG. > > > > > > > >Any recommendations? > > > > > > > > > > mutt has less calories and will make girls want to have sex with you. > > maybe the > > > second part is just advertising hype... > > > > > > it also has s/mime and gpg capabilities, is text based and does your > > laundry. > > > I have used mutt for a while now and it does not do my laundry.
You must have forgotten the optional mutt_laundry.config file -- U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong Terror - New York Times 9/3/1967
