在 2020/1/12 21:15, Malcolm MacLeod 写道:
>
> There is absolutely no point in putting work into something that will never
> be accepted, which based
> on your solitary input so far is the case.
>
> Therefore I'm seeking input as to how such a patch should look in order for
> it to not be a complete
> waste of my time. As soon as I'm satisfied that its actually worth
> contributing such a patch I'll be
> happy to do so, but certainly no sooner.
>
> If you are not willing to provide such input then perhaps somebody else
> involved in the project is,
> I do hold hope of this and I'll eagerly await such a response.
>
>
>
Sorry for the diction and misunderstanding. It will be really nice of
you if you contribute, and we will appreciate your help.
To be precise: It was not being an extension that I dislike. What I
dislike is that the `pthread_{get,set}_num_processors_np()` functions
only care about the number of logical processors thus are unaware of
processor groups. Things such as `pthread_{get,set}affinity_np()` on
Linux would be much more satisfactory, which are good inspiration too.
--
Best regards,
LH_Mouse
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
