在 2020/1/6 17:27, Malcolm MacLeod 写道: > Hello, > > ... > > It seems to me that it should not be difficult to create similar wrappers (for > SetThreadGroupAffinity) that wrap the appropriate win32 calls (as the above > linked code wraps > SetProcessAffinityMask) such that my program (and other peoples programs) can > then set the processor > groups as required to fully utilise all cores on high core count systems. > > > Before I spend time writing such a wrapper I wanted to get opinions - would > the project accept a > patch/pull request that adds a wrapper such as this? Is there some other way > people would prefer to > tackle the problem? >
It's probably not our goal to provide such wrappers, because we are less likely to maintain them. We take WinSDK as references (we provide what they provide - headers, libraries, tools, etc.). We take Glibc as references (we provide many POSIX-conforming functions as well as _some_ of GNU extensions such `getopt_long()` and the 10-byte `long double`). We take Wine as references too (we even share some headers with them). Something without a reference is unlikely to be accepted unless it is proved to be very essential. -- Best regards, LH_Mouse
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
