On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:28 AM, JonY <jo...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> On 9/20/2010 22:36, Earnie wrote:
>> Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> 2010/9/20 Earnie<ear...@users.sourceforge.net>:
>>>> Cesar Strauss wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Since MSYS is derived from Cygwin, one way to get 64-bit support
>>>>> for MSYS would be to add it first to Cygwin and port it to MSYS
>>>>> later. However, as this thread indicates, there is currently some
>>>>> interest on bringing 64-bit support to MSYS, while I do not have
>>>>> evidence there is a similar interest on the Cygwin front. So, it
>>>>> may make sense to do it the other way around this time (adding
>>>>> 64-bit support to MSYS first and contributing back to Cygwin
>>>>> later).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I suggest that it would make more sense "the other way around".
>>>> Since MinGW GCC is used for parts of the Cygwin/MSYS build
>>>> process, incorporation of mingw-64 into Cygwin/MSYS would also need
>>>> to take place.
>>>>
>>>> Earnie
>>>
>>> Well, AFAIU this subject about porting msys (cygwin) to x64 requires
>>> the following steps.
>>>
>>> 1.) Port the internal runtime-dll (sorry I am just knowing cygwin's
>>> name here) cygwin1.dll. As this provides the syscalls required for
>>> any later build. 2.) Port gcc/binutils to support the
>>> x86_64-*-cygwin* target. This step shouldn't be too hard, but has for
>>> sure some pitfalls 3.) Best in parallel to 2.) Porting newlib
>>> beginning from headers.
>>>
>>> After that real fun begins as all unix tools need to be ported to
>>> LLP64 ABI.
>>>
>>
>>> From what I recall newlib, the base of Cygwin's runtime, already
>> contains the necessary IA64 runtime code.  The Cygwin wrappers though
>> would need to be modified to use it.  And to self host a GCC that
>> targets the new Cygwin runtime would need to be built but the initial
>> work could be completed as a cross build from Linux.
>>
>> Earnie
>>
>
> Will 64bit Cygwin be LP64 or LLP64? I sure hope its the former, but I
> don't know how much thunk is needed.

That would be a question for the cygwin people.  I personally see no
reason that it wouldn't match the Win64 platform standard.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to