> > This is something I've been on the fence about for a while, mostly > because the vulkan and gl driver for mesa come out of the same source > base.
In addition to the issues raised by Jason, radv isn't the only Vulkan driver for AMD GPUs. I don't think Andres patch should be made jump through hoops for a driver that isn't open source. AMD are free to provide patches to support this use case but asking anyone outside AMD to care for a piece of software that isn't open source, isn't a very nice thing to do. >From reading Jason's requests it does look like just leave it to the drivers to sort out is the best option, and for radeonsi/radv we could go with a static string as we at least share addrlib in this world. Beyond that I think AMD would need to propose later patch for interop with the pro driver. Dave.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
