Looks like a great start... I agree with a lot of the other comments here - especially about splitting it up into two sections for apps and implementations.
Lines 60-62 seem to disallow the possibility of producing apps using byte-code compiled languages like java or C# - is that intentional? Warren On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Wichmann, Mats D <[email protected]> wrote: > > There's a rough early version available on > http://wiki.meego.com/Quality/Compliance > > We'd like to ask for feeback on this at various levels, > the most important being the highest level: does it > get anywhere close to describing an implementation of > the basic principles, as presented most recently > at the TSC meeting: > > http://trac.tspre.org/meetbot/meego-meeting/2010/meego-meeting.2010-08-18-18.58.html > (follow to "full logs" to see the discussion) > > and mainly the reference: > > http://wiki.meego.com/Technical_Steering_Group_meetings/Compliance_Update_8-18-10 > > Probably it's not worth worrying about small items > (spelling, grammar) at the moment as there are likely > to be large changes which could make those disappear > as a side effect. > > For the moment this is too rudimentary for it to make > a lot of sense to tie it in to bugzilla entries, but > we'll add a category there later as the document matures. > > So I'm proposing we just follow up to this thread - > edits, questions, comments, etc. > > > Thanks, > > -- mats > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev > -- Warren Baird - Photographer and Digital Artist http://www.synergisticimages.ca _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
