Thanks - what I'm not quite clear on is where does MK-HAL end and LCNC start. Is there a library, program, interface that needs adapting? If one wanted to have a go at it, what would be a general plan of attack and where would one start? I can't commit on anything at the moment but I'm genuinely interested in how this works.
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 11:34:38 +0100 Bas de Bruijn <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3 Dec 2019, at 20:44, markus <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I think that the best hope is that someday LCNC can be built on top > >> of Machinekit-HAL. I think chances of ports to Machinekit are > >> nonexistent. Maybe some developers can chime in. > >> > > > > Newbie here - what does that mean running LCNC on top of MK HAL ? > > Machinekit-HAL is the HAL part without the CNC application. The > Machinekit HAL differs a lot with the HAL from LinuxCNC. Multicore > capabilities, instantiatiable components, remote capabilities and > whatnot. So Linuxcnc can potentially reuse Machinekit-HAL. > -- website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: https://github.com/machinekit --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Machinekit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/machinekit/20191204091106.755fcb61%40edeltraud.
