Endill added a comment. In D156774#4601736 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D156774#4601736>, @Michael137 wrote:
> What were your lldb commands when you tested this? `script import lldb; frame = lldb.thread.GetFrameAtIndex(0); print(frame.variables[0].type.GetNumberOfMemberEnums())` > LLDB currently completes types lazily when it thinks it can. Does your new > API still fail if you run `expr p` prior? (the idea is that that would > trigger completion of the type and parse dwarf). If we dont ever call > `GetFullCompilerType` on your type LLDB will never try to pull in the > definition No amount of tinkering with `expr` makes `script print(frame.variables[0].type.GetNumberOfMemberEnums())` output a non-zero value. I tested this with the changes I uploaded here half an hour ago. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D156774/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D156774 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
