Michael137 added a comment.

In D156774#4572967 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D156774#4572967>, @Endill wrote:

> In D156774#4572947 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D156774#4572947>, @Michael137 
> wrote:
>
>> Are you still planning on moving this forward? Otherwise I could commandeer 
>> the revision to get this in. I do think it's a useful bug to address
>
> I do. Locally I've been preparing additional changes on top of this patch 
> that expose enums in SBType, so that I can do end-to-end test to ensure this 
> sufficiently addresses my use case.
> On top of that, I'm planning to redo this patch after the example of 
> `DW_TAG_subprogram` per your suggestion.
>
> Unfortunately, I didn't have time last week for this, and now I'm knee deep 
> into triaging old Clang bugs. I'm not finished with that until number of open 
> issues is brought under 20k :)

Sounds good, thanks!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D156774/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D156774

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to