bulbazord added a comment.

In D152324#4403368 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D152324#4403368>, @aprantl wrote:

> Is the idea to remove the ConstString from these APIs too? If yes, this LGTM, 
> otherwise it seems to needlessly complicate things.

Yes, I was going to remove ConstString from these other APIs too. I can let 
this patch sit here until I can do more work to make sure that happens though. 
I'm somewhat confident that removing ConstString from this area of LLDB is 
going to be better long-term, but I've been wrong about this before! :)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D152324/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D152324

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
  • [Lldb-commits]... Alex Langford via Phabricator via lldb-commits
    • [Lldb-com... Adrian Prantl via Phabricator via lldb-commits
    • [Lldb-com... Alex Langford via Phabricator via lldb-commits
    • [Lldb-com... Jonas Devlieghere via Phabricator via lldb-commits
    • [Lldb-com... Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan via Phabricator via lldb-commits
    • [Lldb-com... Jim Ingham via Phabricator via lldb-commits
    • [Lldb-com... Alex Langford via Phabricator via lldb-commits

Reply via email to