dblaikie added a comment. In D139379#3972876 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D139379#3972876>, @ayermolo wrote:
> In D139379#3972871 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D139379#3972871>, @dblaikie > wrote: > >> Perhaps the change to use accessors could be removed, now that you've used >> it to find all the places that needed to be fixed up? (like just using it >> for cleanup/temporary purposes, without needing to commit that API change?) > > I am not sure what other projects are using it, that I missed, or not in > llvm-trunk, but are based of it. It's awkward to convolute the API to ensure a breakage - I think it's best to leave it as-is, for the most part. I guess you needed the 32 bit accessors so existing code doesn't become UB because of truncation to 32 bit? Could the code keep the existing member names, provide the wrappers without turning the members into an array and needing named index constants, etc, at least? (though even then, seems like there's more to it than needed) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D139379/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D139379 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
