ayermolo added a comment. In D139379#3972871 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D139379#3972871>, @dblaikie wrote:
> Perhaps the change to use accessors could be removed, now that you've used it > to find all the places that needed to be fixed up? (like just using it for > cleanup/temporary purposes, without needing to commit that API change?) I am not sure what other projects are using it, that I missed, or not in llvm-trunk, but are based of it. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D139379/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D139379 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
