labath added a comment. > To be honest, I can't think of a real use case where aliasing Write() to > WriteAll() would make a caller-visible difference.
If you mean, "in the lldb code base", then you might be right, but generally speaking, the difference is in the handling of interrupts and blocking operations. After a select, a single `write` call is guaranteed not to block (and to write something), but that's is not the case if you're going to be calling it in a loop. I don't know if we have any code like that for writes, but we do rely on this pattern for reads (although we might also make the FD non-blocking -- I don't remember). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D132395/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D132395 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
