mgorny added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lldb/test/API/functionalities/gdb_remote_client/gdbclientutils.py:560-564 + def get_connect_address(self): + libc = ctypes.CDLL(None) + libc.ptsname.argtypes = (ctypes.c_int,) + libc.ptsname.restype = ctypes.c_char_p + return libc.ptsname(self._master).decode() ---------------- labath wrote: > I'm wondering if we should have an overload of SBTarget::ConnectRemote that > accepts a file descriptor (or SBFile, SBCommunication, ...). > > This would make the socket case easier as well, and it seems like it could be > generally useful. I'm not saying 'no' but I think we'd still want to explicitly test `process connect` command somewhere. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D110878/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D110878 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
