jingham added a comment. In D105215#2850821 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D105215#2850821>, @bulbazord wrote:
> I kind of feel that `Language::GetDemangledFunctionNameWithoutArguments` may > be a bit too specific for a generalized language plugins. I think it may be > worth it to make `Mangled` an interface that language plugins can implement > (e.g. `CPlusPlusMangledName`) but I haven't totally thought out what the > ramifications of that would be yet. The name is unfortunate, but the notion that function types have an identifier, that is then decorated by arguments and maybe return types, seems pretty common. So in this particular case, maybe we just need a better name? GetBaseName isn't right since this function also returns any namespace information. Maybe GetFullyQualifiedBaseName? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D105215/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D105215 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
