labath added a comment. In D69371#1721077 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69371#1721077>, @omjavaid wrote:
> We ll be dealing with Linux user mode and mostly aarch64 data registers > except for cpsr, fpsr and fpcr. I think we should be fine but let me confirm > this again from documentation. Right, but you're creating a general interface for all architectures, not just several aarch64 registers. Even if they don't make use of that facility now, it would be good to make sure they can do that in the future. For instance, on x86, the kernel may decide to reject https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c#L187 some values of some registers, and silently ignore some bits in others https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c#L349. That's why I think it would be better to commit changes to memory automatically/immediately, and minimize the chances that subsequent "read" operations will return data which does not reflect the actual values held by the OS. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69371/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69371 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
