hhb added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lldb/scripts/get_relative_lib_dir.py:26 split_libdir = arch_specific_libdir.split(os.sep) - lib_re = re.compile(r"^lib.+$") + lib_re = re.compile(r"^lib.*$") ---------------- mgorny wrote: > hhb wrote: > > If we go this way, should we always use LLDB_PYTHON_RELATIVE_LIBDIR in > > ScriptInterpreterPython.cpp, and add some code to make sure it is defined? > > Because all assumption of the path can be wrong. > > > > After the change here, I think POSIX will always use > > LLDB_PYTHON_RELATIVE_LIBDIR. But for windows, the path is still hard coded > > to lib/site-packages. > > > > (maybe finishSwigPythonLLDB.py / make_symlink() can also be updated to use > > os.path.relpath? ) > Actually, I think we can kill all this logic by simply passing `''` as > prefix, as I did in the CMake part. I'm not sure. On my machine: $ python3 Python 3.6.8 (default, Jan 3 2019, 03:42:36) [GCC 8.2.0] on linux Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. \>>> import distutils.sysconfig \>>> distutils.sysconfig.get_python_lib(True, False) '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages' \>>> distutils.sysconfig.get_python_lib(True, False, '') 'lib/python3/dist-packages' \>>> distutils.sysconfig.get_python_lib(True, False, '/src/lib') '/src/lib/lib/python3.6/site-packages' CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D67890/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D67890 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits