mgorny marked an inline comment as done. mgorny added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lldb/scripts/CMakeLists.txt:45-50 + execute_process( + COMMAND ${PYTHON_EXECUTABLE} + -c "import distutils.sysconfig, sys; print(distutils.sysconfig.get_python_lib(True, False, sys.argv[1]))" + ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR} + OUTPUT_VARIABLE SWIG_PYTHON_DIR + OUTPUT_STRIP_TRAILING_WHITESPACE) ---------------- labath wrote: > mgorny wrote: > > labath wrote: > > > For my own education, is it possible that the result of the > > > `get_python_lib` call will fundamentally differ depending on the value of > > > the third argument. I.e., is there any case where `${SWIG_PYTHON_DIR}` > > > will be different from `${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/${SWIG_INSTALL_DIR}` ? > > The former will be an absolute path while the latter is just the relative > > path. But if you mean whether they could have a different tail: I don't > > think so, at least with CPython. PyPy had some nasty logic, so I'd have to > > check if we ever decided to support that. > Right now that doesn't matter, but I am thinking ahead about the > cross-compilation case. If we turn out to need a cache variable for this, it > would be nice if it would be a single variable that the user could set > (instead of two of them). For that to work, we'd need to be able to compute > the result of one of these calls using the value of the other one. I suppose you mean having a variable specifying path relative to prefix/build dir, I presume? I suppose we could build the whole thing around a cache var defaulting to the sysconfig call as proposed here for `SWIG_INSTALL_DIR` (note it's passing empty prefix to `get_python_lib()` in order to get relative path). Thinking about it, maybe it'd indeed be better for me to prepare a more complete patch built around that, and focus on testing that instead. I was mostly worried/confused by Linux-specific code hanging around. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D67890/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D67890 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits