JDevlieghere added a comment. In D60300#1456485 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60300#1456485>, @aprantl wrote:
> > What's the motivation behind all the `@no_debug_info_test` decorators? Are > > those codepaths guaranteed to be tested elsewhere? > > As a rule of thumb I'd say, let's only stick `@no_debug_info_test` on tests > where a (future) coverage bot proves that it is safe. How does that sound? Sounds good, I'll remove the decorators and we can do this incrementally. Repository: rL LLVM CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60300/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60300 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
