aprantl added a comment. > What's the motivation behind all the `@no_debug_info_test` decorators? Are > those codepaths guaranteed to be tested elsewhere?
As a rule of thumb I'd say, let's only stick `@no_debug_info_test` on tests where a (future) coverage bot proves that it is safe. How does that sound? Repository: rL LLVM CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60300/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60300 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
